I'm finished with the three mornings of workshopping and can catch up on my reading of months of The New Yorker plus (I hope) finishing Jack O'Connell's novel, The Resurrectionist and possibly even read Liz Hand's Rimbaud novel mss.
I think/hope that the writers (ten of them) got what they had hoped to out of the critique process.

There have been heavy summer showers on and off --it's lovely sitting on the porch and watching sheets of rain. Or hearing it while inside. It cools off and then is sunny and humid again.

This evening some of the workshoppers are playing word games. I thought I'd catch up here (I hate games) and then skim more New Yorkers. I took a nap this afternoon before helping with dinner. Very relaxing.

There's at least one non-weather storm about to break though, once Dave Truesdale posts his review of The Del Rey Book of SF&F (on SF Site) which will include a rant (he's already provided a foreshadowing on the Asimov's Message Board) about Margo Lanagan's brutal horror story, "The Goosle."

I'll post a link to his rant on my blog. And would be happy to hear other opinions about the story when the time comes. I am fully aware it's not an "enjoyable" story. It's not meant to be, and I certainly don't expect everyone to appreciate it. Perhaps at some point Margo will come by to comment on the comments.

From: [identity profile] benpayne.livejournal.com


I didn't mind it, although it didn't grab me the way some of the other stories in the anthology did. It was a very interesting piece, though.

My personal way of characterising Margo's work is this: I think she's brilliant at imagery, and has a wonderful sense of the grotesque and perverse. Her weaknesses (to me) are that her characters feel distant and her work often feels cold and removed.

Whether a particular reader likes her stories depends on how much they value those particular things; in particular whether they read more for mood and imagery or for emotion.

I could be wrong... that's just the impression I've gotten from talking about her work with people...

Anyway, will be interested to see what Trusdale thinks... I think it's a very good story that I personally didn't get sucked into... if that makes sense... :-)

From: [identity profile] ellen-datlow.livejournal.com


I have no problem with readers preferring one story or type of story to another type. Or even to not relating to/enjoying a story. But I do have a problem with someone saying that a story should not have been written or published, which is, I suspect, exactly what Dave is going to (has already said)--he said it would make NAMBLA happy. ThAT I find offensive.

From: [identity profile] benpayne.livejournal.com


Well I don't blame you... that's very offensive, and total rubbish into the bargain!

DT would be disgusted to know that this discussion made me go re-read it and I enjoyed it more the second time :-)

I find it difficult to see how he could sustain that argument at all...

From: [identity profile] ellen-datlow.livejournal.com


Don't know if you've read the whole review, which apparently was posted today. (I haven't read it yet as of 1:40).
.

Profile

ellen_datlow: (Default)
ellen_datlow

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags