Several people have asked me to discuss the process, but more I think would like to know the thinking process that goes into my book. I can't speak for other Year's Best editors--we all have our own different ways of working and of course, different tastes.

What I'll attempt to do periodically, is post a few of my mini-reviews of novels/collections/anthologies/magazines and maybe even non-fiction titles that I'm reading and making notes on during the year. And I will try to answer questions about why something worked for me...

I am NOT a critic, I'm not even any kind of expert on horror's history. I just have read over the past 21 years, and continue read a lot of horror short stories and know what I do and don't like. I may not always be able to define the why of my judgment.

I'm certainly open to arguments as to why someone else thinks I missed the boat on something...the only problem with that is that I may just say--well it didn't work for me or I hated it ;-) and the latter is something I'd rather NOT do. I will not trash anything in public, although I reserve the right to give negative criticism on occasion.

One thing I'll add, is that YBFH is an ongoing project--I rarely take a break between the last and next volume. I'm constantly taking notes on what I've read. I've stopped mentioning every magazine I read but instead mention the top maybe ten in genre and those that while not in-genre can be counted on to have some good dark fiction, at least once in awhile.



I'll start posting some of my 2007 notes in the next entry.
Tags:
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
.

Profile

ellen_datlow: (Default)
ellen_datlow

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags