Last night I watched four episodes of Deadwood, beginning the second season. And they were very fine. I was talking to my mother about the series today while visiting her and my dad. We talked about its Shakespearean aspects and she thought there were elements of Antigone --I'm not sure which one--I assume the original. She felt Al commenting on the action from his balcony was kind of Greek Chorus like--I don't agree with that but the dialog is becoming more and Shakespearean in both its cadences and the language itself (except for the "fucks"). The characters get richer as the series goes on. I told my mother she should try to rent it for my dad to watch--I think he's like it. Or maybe there would be too much talking for him and not enough action.
Tonight I watched American Gangster. I'm not sure what I expected, but I did hope for more. I have the feeling that Ridley Scott was going for an African American Godfather and it just didn't work as such. I skimmed the original article by Mark Jacobson in NY Magazine a few years ago upon which the script is based and was unimpressed by the character of Frank Lucas then. He was a thug in real life. He's a thug in the movie, no matter how good-looking Denzel Washington is (and he IS). In the opening scene he murders someone horribly, passionlessly, and we don't get inside him at ALL.
I've been comparing his character (and others in the movie) to other gangsters in some relatively recent American movies that worked better (I'm not saying they're necessarily better movies, although some obviously are) in order to figure out why HE as a character didn't move me.
The Corleones in The Godfather--each son had a distinct personality. In American Gangster Lucas's brothers did not --we spend very little time with each brother. The mother (played by Ruby Dee) is good in a very small role.
In Scarface Pacino goes way over the top but at least he's dramatically interesting. Goodfellas of course has the terrifying performance by Joe Pesci. Ray Liotta's a mook but it doesn't matter because the gang around him is colorful.
Denzel Washington is smart, greedy (I guess), ruthless (although it seems to come out of nothing), passionless. Basically, he's a very dull character. I don't know if it's the script or the performance. Russell Crowe as the one honest cop in town is much better. And for me, the most interesting part of the movie is the end when they meet for the first time and the last 15 minutes. I'll have to see if I come to any other conclusions after the movie sinks in... but I'd very much like to hear what others felt about the movie if you've seen it. And if you disagree, please tell me what you think I've missed.
Tonight I watched American Gangster. I'm not sure what I expected, but I did hope for more. I have the feeling that Ridley Scott was going for an African American Godfather and it just didn't work as such. I skimmed the original article by Mark Jacobson in NY Magazine a few years ago upon which the script is based and was unimpressed by the character of Frank Lucas then. He was a thug in real life. He's a thug in the movie, no matter how good-looking Denzel Washington is (and he IS). In the opening scene he murders someone horribly, passionlessly, and we don't get inside him at ALL.
I've been comparing his character (and others in the movie) to other gangsters in some relatively recent American movies that worked better (I'm not saying they're necessarily better movies, although some obviously are) in order to figure out why HE as a character didn't move me.
The Corleones in The Godfather--each son had a distinct personality. In American Gangster Lucas's brothers did not --we spend very little time with each brother. The mother (played by Ruby Dee) is good in a very small role.
In Scarface Pacino goes way over the top but at least he's dramatically interesting. Goodfellas of course has the terrifying performance by Joe Pesci. Ray Liotta's a mook but it doesn't matter because the gang around him is colorful.
Denzel Washington is smart, greedy (I guess), ruthless (although it seems to come out of nothing), passionless. Basically, he's a very dull character. I don't know if it's the script or the performance. Russell Crowe as the one honest cop in town is much better. And for me, the most interesting part of the movie is the end when they meet for the first time and the last 15 minutes. I'll have to see if I come to any other conclusions after the movie sinks in... but I'd very much like to hear what others felt about the movie if you've seen it. And if you disagree, please tell me what you think I've missed.