ellen_datlow: (Default)
ellen_datlow ([personal profile] ellen_datlow) wrote2008-08-20 05:11 pm

A rant on proper manuscript formatting

Recent reading and editing has brought to my attention the fact that some writers have suddenly (well, since using computers and email) decided that the usual rules of mss preparation are no longer necessary.

Three examples:
1) I have received print submissions without PAGE NUMBERS (not often, but still, this should never happen).

2) I have increasingly been the recipient of manuscripts that don't underline words meant to be italicized in the story's final, printed form. The reason editors/copy editors/and whoever does the production on a mss need to see underlines is that some typefaces don't show italics very well, and even if they did--it's quicker to "see" underline than italics

3)I have been receiving mss without anything indicating space breaks. What happened to ###? I'm in the middle of reading a printout that seemed to be missing at least two pages because there were no transitions...When I checked the efile, lo and behold, the sentence breaks were in different places so I could actually see that there were supposed to be space breaks. Writers--new and pro--please please show your space breaks by putting in hash marks.

4) Paragraphing--before online publishing, paragraphing was shown by indenting margins...Guess what, folks? Most publishing (especially of books) is still print, which means that paragraphs are indented.

Rant over

[identity profile] madwriter.livejournal.com 2008-08-21 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
One reason I haven't done writing workshops for awhile is because now and again I would want to talk about things like proper manuscript format, proper spelling and grammar, and so on, but the workshop coordinators would get huffy and say they did not want to include technical discussions. In a few cases they made it clear that they thought technical discussions would impinge on creativity. In cases where I pointed out to a class that editors might not even bother looking at a manuscript containing errors of language or format, some coordinators got downright angry, implying that playing by the editorial rules was a detriment to creativity.

I don't know if this is related to your rant, but I deeply suspect it or something similar may be.

[identity profile] ellen-datlow.livejournal.com 2008-08-21 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
What kind of workshops do you attend? Mainstream ones?
Most sff workshops I know of would never say such a thing.

[identity profile] madwriter.livejournal.com 2008-08-21 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I hadn't thought about that--but now that you mention it, you're right, they were all mainstream workshops (or classes). Almost evenly split between fiction and poetry too.